Territorial bioeconomy and biodiversity: opportunities and challenges for sustainable local development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71068/ec000056Keywords:
territorial bioeconomy, biodiversity, bio-based value chains, local development, sustainabilityAbstract
Introduction: Evidence on territorial bioeconomy, biodiversity conservation, bio-based value chains and sustainable local development has expanded during the last years, but differences in design, scale, indicators and territorial context still complicate direct comparison. A traceable synthesis is therefore needed. Objective: To critically examine the evidence on territorial bioeconomy, biodiversity conservation, bio-based value chains and sustainable local development, identifying recurrent mechanisms, context-dependent effects and gaps that matter for policy and territorial. Method: A structured narrative review was conducted for the 2019–2024 publication window using the corrected evidence matrix supplied for this manuscript. The final corpus comprised 21 peer-reviewed journal studies, each with a real and traceable DOI. Searches and verification considered Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, Google Scholar and journal platforms. Eligibility required thematic relevance, explicit methods, recoverable results and bibliographic traceability. Study context, design, analytical dimensions, principal findings and. Results: The evidence indicates that territorial bioeconomy is most credible when value creation is linked to biodiversity safeguards, local capabilities and transparent benefit-sharing. Methodological studies also show that territorial diagnosis and socio-biodiversity indicators reveal trade-offs that conventional economic metrics frequently miss. Across the corpus, stronger inferences came from studies. Conclusions: The synthesis supports context-sensitive decisions rather than universal prescriptions. For bioeconomía territorial, biodiversidad y desarrollo local sostenible, future research should improve comparability of indicators, reporting transparency and longitudinal assessment, while explicitly documenting equity, governance and implementation conditions.
Downloads
References
1. Heimann T. Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the Bioeconomy Support the Achievement of the SDGs?. Earth's Future. 2019;7:43-57. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001014.
2. Ricard Calvo-Palomares, Juli Antoni Aguado-Hernández, Enric Sigalat-Signes, Bernat Roig-Merino. A New Methodology to Assess Territorial Competence for Sustainable Local Development: The READI® (Resources-Actors-Dynamics) Matrix. Sustainability. 2021;13(11):6022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116022.
3. Maria Sylvia Macchione Saes, Beatriz Macchione Saes, Elis Regina Monte Feitosa, Peter Poschen, Adalberto Luis Val, Jacques Marcovitch. When Do Supply Chains Strengthen Biological and Cultural Diversity? Methods and Indicators for the Socio-Biodiversity Bioeconomy. Sustainability. 2023;15(10):8053. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108053.
4. P. J. Stephenson, Anca Damerell. Bioeconomy and Circular Economy Approaches Need to Enhance the Focus on Biodiversity to Achieve Sustainability. Sustainability. 2022;14(17):10643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710643.
5. James Gaffey, Cathal O’Donovan, Declan Murphy, Tracey O’Connor, David Walsh, Luis Alejandro Vergara, Kwame Donkor, Lalitha Gottumukkala et al. Synergetic Benefits for a Pig Farm and Local Bioeconomy Development from Extended Green Biorefinery Value Chains. Sustainability. 2023;15(11):8692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118692.
6. Samuel Hoffmann. Challenges and opportunities of area-based conservation in reaching biodiversity and sustainability goals. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2022;31(2):325-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02340-2.
7. Raymond Clémençon. Is sustainable development bad for global biodiversity conservation?. Global Sustainability. 2021;4:e16. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2021.14.
8. Alicja Kacprzak. Forest Sector in a Sustainable and Circular Bioeconomy: Sustainability and Circularity of Forest-Based Value Chains. SilvaWorld. 2023;2(1):26-35. https://doi.org/10.29329/silva.2023.518.04.
9. Jon Marín, Teresa Garnatje, Joan Vallès. Agro-Food Supply Chains in Peri-Urban Agricultural Areas: Do They Contribute to Preserve Local Biodiversity? The Case of Baix Llobregat Agrarian Park. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):2882. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072882.
10. Csaba Lentner. Sustainability and Control Issues of the Financial Management of Local Governments, Through Hungary’s Example. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development. 2019;8(2):53-57. https://doi.org/10.2478/vjbsd-2019-0010.
11. Stephanie D. Maier, Jan Paul Lindner, Javier Francisco. Conceptual Framework for Biodiversity Assessments in Global Value Chains. Sustainability. 2019;11(7):1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071841.
12. Zhengqiu Ding, Karen Thorsted Hamann, Philipp Grundmann. Enhancing circular bioeconomy in Europe: Sustainable valorization of residual grassland biomass for emerging bio-based value chains. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2024;45:265-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.01.008.
13. Emogine Mamabolo, Maria M. Makwela, Toi J. Tsilo. Achieving Sustainability and Biodiversity Conservation in Agriculture: Importance, Challenges and Prospects. European Journal of Sustainable Development. 2020;9(3):616. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n3p616.
14. Yuka Makino, Michelle Geringer, Sara Manuelli. Promoting Mountain Biodiversity Through Sustainable Value Chains. Mountain Research and Development. 2020;40(4). https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd-journal-d-20-00067.1
15. Nicolas Robert, Ragnar Jonsson, Rafał Chudy, Andrea Camia. The EU Bioeconomy: Supporting an Employment Shift Downstream in the Wood-Based Value Chains?. Sustainability. 2020;12(3):758. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030758.
16. Pablo Pérez-Akaki, Nadia Viridiana Vega-Vera, Yuritzi Paola Enríquez-Caballero, Marisol Velázquez-Salazar. Designation of Origin Distillates in Mexico: Value Chains and Territorial Development. Sustainability. 2021;13(10):5496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105496.
17. Lisa Biber‐Freudenberger, Candan Ergeneman, Jan Janosch Förster, Thomas Dietz, Jan Börner. Bioeconomy futures: Expectation patterns of scientists and practitioners on the sustainability of bio‐based transformation. Sustainable Development. 2020;28(5):1220-1235. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2072.
18. Sven Wydra. Value Chains for Industrial Biotechnology in the Bioeconomy-Innovation System Analysis. Sustainability. 2019;11(8):2435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082435.
19. Thiago Chagas de Almeida, Magnus Luiz Emmendoerfer, Marcos Eduardo Carvalho Gonçalves Knupp. Public Territorial Governance and Community-Based Tourism for Sustainable Local Development: A Case-Study of Paraty, Brazil. Tourism Cases. 2024;:tourism202400074. https://doi.org/10.1079/tourism.2024.0074
20. Chavarría Miranda H, Trigo E, Martínez JF. Políticas y negocios para la bioeconomía en ALC: un proceso en marcha. C3-BIOECONOMY. 2021;1:72-88. https://doi.org/10.21071/c3b.vi1.13150.
21. D'Amato D, Bartkowski B, Droste N. Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research. Ambio. 2020;49:1878-1896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0.
22. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
23. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 2019;4:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dayana Mishelle Sigüenza Sánchez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

