Efectos de la infraestructura verde urbana sobre servicios ecosistémicos, bienestar social y adaptación climática: revisión sistemática internacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71068/09jr2b93Palabras clave:
infraestructura verde urbana, servicios ecosistémicos, bienestar social, adaptación climática, equidad ambientalResumen
Introducción: La evidencia sobre infraestructura verde urbana, servicios ecosistémicos y bienestar social ha aumentado durante los últimos años, pero las diferencias de diseño, escala, indicadores y contexto territorial todavía dificultan la comparación directa. Por ello, se requiere una síntesis trazable que permita separar. Objetivo: Evaluar sistemáticamente la evidencia sobre infraestructura verde urbana, servicios ecosistémicos y bienestar social, identificando mecanismos recurrentes, efectos dependientes del contexto y vacíos relevantes para la política pública y la gestión. Método: Se realizó una revisión sistemática para la ventana 2020–2025 a partir de la matriz de evidencia del manuscrito. El corpus final estuvo integrado por 23 estudios publicados en revistas académicas, todos con DOI real y trazable. La localización y verificación consideró Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, SciELO, Redalyc, Google Scholar y plataformas editoriales. La elegibilidad exigió pertinencia temática, método explícito, resultados recuperables y trazabilidad bibliográfica. Resultados: Los estudios relacionan la infraestructura verde con servicios ecosistémicos de regulación y culturales, moderación térmica y bienestar. La magnitud de los beneficios depende de configuración, accesibilidad y forma urbana; la evidencia sobre equidad distributiva y redes verdes completas es menos madura. Las inferencias más sólidas provienen de trabajos. Conclusiones: La síntesis respalda decisiones sensibles al contexto y no prescripciones universales. Para infraestructura verde urbana, servicios ecosistémicos y bienestar social, la investigación futura debe mejorar comparabilidad de indicadores, transparencia del reporte y seguimiento longitudinal, además de documentar explícitamente.
Descargas
Referencias
1. Kamiński J, Głowienka E, Soszyński D, Trzaskowska E, Stuczyński T, Siebielec G, et al. Integrating Expert Assessments and Spectral Methods to Evaluate Visual Attractiveness and Ecosystem Services of Urban Informal Green Spaces in the Context of Climate Adaptation. Sustainability. 2025;17(4):1349. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041349
2. Radomska MM. Biodiversity based solutions for the support of ecosystem services, provided by urban green infrastructure. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU. 2022;32(5):50-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.36930/40320507
3. Nastran M, Pintar M, Železnikar Š, Cvejić R. Stakeholders’ Perceptions on the Role of Urban Green Infrastructure in Providing Ecosystem Services for Human Well-Being. Land. 2022;11(2):299. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020299
4. Zhong Z, Fang X, Kong L. Pathways linking urban green infrastructure to residents’ well-being: The mediating roles of ecosystem services and physical activity in Shanghai. Transactions in Earth, Environment, and Sustainability. 2024;2(3-4):232-48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2754124x251328543
5. Monteiro GF, Gallardo ALCF, Cortese TTP, Nascimento APB. Green Urban Infrastructure and the Potential for Offering Ecosystem Services for Climate Adaptation: Land Use Analysis of the Pinheiros District (São Paulo). Revista Nacional de Gerenciamento de Cidades. 2022;10(81). Available from: https://doi.org/10.17271/23188472108120223351
6. Cheng X, Van Damme S, Uyttenhove P. A review of empirical studies of cultural ecosystem services in urban green infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021;293:112895. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112895
7. Amorim JH, Engardt M, Johansson C, Ribeiro I, Sannebro M. Regulating and Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Green Infrastructure in the Nordic Countries: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(3):1219. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031219
8. Boehnke D, Krehl A, Mörmann K, Volk R, Lützkendorf T, Naber E, et al. Mapping Urban Green and Its Ecosystem Services at Microscale—A Methodological Approach for Climate Adaptation and Biodiversity. Sustainability. 2022;14(15):9029. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159029
9. Negash AW, Simegn SD. Ecosystem services of urban green infrastructure: a review on woody plant species conservation and carbon sequestration in Ethiopia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2025;197(12):1309. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14701-3
10. Venter ZS, Barton DN, Martinez-Izquierdo L, Langemeyer J, Baró F, McPhearson T. Interactive spatial planning of urban green infrastructure, Retrofitting green roofs where ecosystem services are most needed in Oslo. Ecosystem Services. 2021;50:101314. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101314
11. Razzaghi Asl S, Pearsall H. How Do Different Modes of Governance Support Ecosystem Services/Disservices in Small-Scale Urban Green Infrastructure? A Systematic Review. Land. 2022;11(8):1247. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081247
12. Butt AN, Rigoni C. The Green Blueprint: Designing Future Cities with Urban Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem Services in the UK. Land. 2025;14(6):1306. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061306
13. Yao Y, Zheng H, Ouyang Z, Gong C, Zhang J, Ying L, et al. Impact of urban green infrastructure on ecosystem services: A systematic review. Ecological Indicators. 2025;178:113885. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113885
14. Andrade M, Fernandes C, Coutinho A, Figueiredo A. Urban Green Infrastructure: Does Species’ Origin Impair Ecosystem Services Provision?. Land. 2023;13(1):23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13010023
15. Morpurgo J, Remme RP, Van Bodegom PM. CUGIC: The Consolidated Urban Green Infrastructure Classification for assessing ecosystem services and biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2023;234:104726. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104726
16. Enssle F, Kabisch N. Urban green spaces for the social interaction, health and well-being of older people, An integrated view of urban ecosystem services and socio-environmental justice. Environmental Science & Policy. 2020;109:36-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.008
17. Hanna E, Bruno D, Comín FA. The ecosystem services supplied by urban green infrastructure depend on their naturalness, functionality and imperviousness. Urban Ecosystems. 2024;27(1):187-202. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01442-9
18. Rodrigues BN, Favoreti ALF, Molina Júnior VE, Silva CM, Canteras FB. Green infrastructure for urban climate mitigation and adaptation: methods, strategies, and typology selection based on ecosystem services. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2025;22(16):17383-404. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-025-06754-1
19. Di Palma M, Rigillo M, Leone MF. Remote Sensing Technologies for Mapping Ecosystem Services: An Analytical Approach for Urban Green Infrastructure. Sustainability. 2024;16(14):6220. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146220
20. Zheng Z. Analysing urban green infrastructure network (GIN) for resilience and ecosystem services: The standards and methods. Theoretical and Natural Science. 2023;15(1):171-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/15/20240475
21. Autores: ver fuente editorial. Trade-offs and synergies in urban green infrastructure: A systematic review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2024;94:128262. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128262
22. Autores: ver fuente editorial. Ecosystem services and well-being dimensions related to urban green spaces, A systematic review. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2022;85:104072. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104072
23. Korkou M, Tarigan AKM, Hanslin HM. The multifunctionality concept in urban green infrastructure planning: A systematic literature review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2023;85:127975. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127975
24. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Anthony Anderson Acosta Alcívar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
